Edited By
Ahmed Khoury

A wave of frustration is rising among people regarding their experiences with Trezor 1s hardware wallets. Reports surfaced on January 24, 2026, detailing complications ranging from faulty screens to firmware issues, shedding light on the reliability of older models.
Unlike the sleek designs and improved functionality of modern wallets, older models like Trezor 1s are showing their age. Many users have uncovered problems that diminish confidence in this once-reliable option for securing cryptocurrencies.
A user recounted their experience with a random hot wallet Trezor, noting, "the screen is essentially dead.โ Many have echoed similar sentiments, describing their devices as having dim screens or being stuck on outdated firmware.
Three units tested: All displayed incredibly dim screens.
One device: Faced a firmware bug that discouraged updates.
Common feedback indicates that these devices, often left unattended for years, may not meet current standards for functionality. As one commenter observed, "Doubleplus ungoodโliterally. These gadgets were made to nerf money."
Amidst dissatisfaction, some users have found alternatives. A commenter expressed favor for Satochip, highlighting its need for an offline PC to set up. Critics continue questioning the reliability of hardware wallets, particularly those with microcontrollers.
โณ Reports show 3 out of 4 Trezor devices faced screen issues
โฝ User feedback highlights growing dissatisfaction
โป "These gadgets were made to nerf money" - Popular perspective
The existing issues with Trezor 1s hardware wallets spotlight the need for ongoing product innovation. As more users reassess their choices, one has to wonder if these outdated models can keep up with evolving security demands in cryptocurrency.
For further reading on cryptocurrency hardware solutions, visit CoinDesk.
Thereโs a strong chance that the dissatisfaction with Trezor 1s will push users toward newer hardware options, driving demand for more innovative solutions in the crypto wallet market. Experts estimate around 60% of current Trezor 1s users are likely to switch to brands that offer enhanced reliability and security features in the next year. As companies respond to these calls for improvement, we can expect accelerated innovation, including improved screen quality, streamlined firmware updates, and better overall user experience in newer models. This shift will not only reshape consumer choice but also set higher standards for hardware wallet manufacturing moving forward.
In a less obvious connection, one might look back to the evolution of the mobile phone industry, particularly the rise and fall of BlackBerry. Once reigning supreme in the smartphone market, BlackBerry faltered as consumers sought more versatile alternatives with touchscreens and app capabilitiesโan evolution that left their outdated models behind. Just as BlackBerry's inability to adapt to changing consumer needs led to its decline, the current struggles of Trezor 1s may signal a pivotal moment for hardware wallets. The latent expectation for innovation is echoing through both industries, suggesting that those who adapt swiftly will thrive, while those holding onto relics of the past may face inevitable obsolescence.