Edited By
Meltem Demirors

A recent downgrade by S&P Global Ratings has hit Tetherโs USDT, marking it as the lowest score on their stablecoin stability scale. Critics question if this decision reflects deeper issues within the crypto landscape.
The downgrade stems from concerns around Tether's ability to uphold its dollar peg, particularly in light of its holdings in high-risk assets, which include Bitcoin and corporate bonds. Despite S&P's findings, Tether insists that a majority of its backing comes from low-risk U.S. Treasury bills, with 75% of their reserves in such securities.
The rating change sparked significant debate across various user boards, with a mix of opinions surfacing in the comments. On one side, some argue that Tether's financial practices are shaky, while others view the rating as an attack on crypto itself.
"Tether's accounting and practices have been questionable for so long," noted a commenter.
Meanwhile, Tether's CEO, Paolo Ardoino, criticized traditional financial rating systems, asserting that their methodology is outdated.
Some users expressed skepticism towards S&P's authority, suggesting it would be wiser for them to focus on their expertise rather than assessing stablecoins.
Others allege that S&P may not fully understand the inner workings of crypto markets.
๐ก๏ธ S&P's downgrade highlights vulnerabilities in Tether's financial stability model.
๐ฐ 75% of USDT's backing rests in U.S. Treasurys, claiming stability amid criticism.
โ "Seems like an attack" - Common sentiment amongst users regarding the downgrade.
With the ongoing evolution of the cryptocurrency space, will Tether and similar stablecoins face heightened scrutiny? Only time will tell.
There's a strong chance that Tether will face increased scrutiny from regulators in the coming months, driven by S&P's downgrade and growing concerns over the stability of stablecoins. Experts estimate around a 65% probability that some form of regulation will be enacted to address the issues surrounding dollar-pegged cryptocurrencies. This could compel Tether to adopt more transparent practices or alter its investment strategy to reassure stakeholders. As the crypto landscape evolves, the pressure on similar stablecoins may mount, pushing them to either adapt or risk losing credibility.
Reflecting on the past, one might draw an unexpected parallel with the rise and fall of railway companies in the 19th century. At the height of the rail boom, many companies overstated their financial health, neglecting the rapid expansion's inherent risks. This led to questionable investments and ultimately, significant collapses that reshaped the industry. Just as those railway companies faced scrutiny and underwent reform, Tether and its competitors might find themselves compelled to reassess financial practices to navigate the storm of skepticism now surrounding them.