Edited By
Alexei Volkov

In a groundbreaking study on Hyperliquid HIP-3, an independent researcher analyzed 3.4 million closed positions from 185 traders. Findings reveal distinct patterns followed by consistent profit-makers, challenging traditional trading assumptions. What do they do differently?
The analysis, conducted over two weeks, focused on on-chain data from 0xArchive. The researcher utilized AI coding tools to filter out noise and identify successful trading strategies. Key methods included:
Data Aggregation: Raw fills were grouped by order ID for accuracy, filtering profit and loss by matching opens to closes.
Trader Selection: Those with a win rate over 70% were chosen from 29,000 addresses.
Upon filtering, the top 50 traders revealed surprising insights, including:
Every top trader was long-only, showing zero profitable shorts. This raised questions about market dynamics: Are shorts constrained by funding costs or liquidity issues?
"Funding kills shorts or no short liquidity. Wild either way."
Traders did not only average down; they also bought on rallies, utilizing a pyramiding strategy. Out of 411 trades backtested, results showed:
75% win rate
+500 average returns
A staggering +2000% ROI
Interestingly, 85% of the trades saw DCA activation only as a safety net, indicating a strategic approach to handles bad entries rather than reckless averaging.
Traders averaged less than 1x leverage, a stark contrast to typical trading norms. The best performer retained an impressive 100% win rate over 61 trades.
Comments from the community highlight essential themes in this study:
Market Stress Adaptation: Questions arose about how these strategies hold up in market downturns.
Timing and Strategy Correlation: 62% entered positions during the NYSE open, raising curiosity about momentum plays.
Potential Funding Bias: The prevalence of long positions may suggest shorts need higher precision due to market conditions.
馃搱 All top traders were long-only, indicating a market bias.
馃搲 DCA strategies combine both averaging down and adding on rallies.
馃捁 Average leverage was remarkably low, under 1x.
"Consistently profitable on a transparent venue doesn鈥檛 look like signal alpha. It鈥檚 position management."
This analysis not only sheds light on the habits of successful traders but also suggests the bar for on-chain research has lowered significantly. No extensive team or heavy financial backing was needed. What does this mean for the future of on-chain trading analysis?
traders might see a continued shift towards long-only strategies as market conditions dictate. Analysts estimate around a 70% probability that this trend will encourage more traders to adopt conservative leverage approaches, mimicking the successes of top performers. The usage of dual-direction dollar-cost averaging may gain traction, as many will likely be seeking ways to mitigate risk while enhancing returns. Experts suggest a possible increase in data analytics tools aimed at retail traders, leading them to refine their strategies further in the coming year.
Interestingly, the strategies of today鈥檚 successful crypto traders echo the experiences of 19th-century gold rush miners. While some chased fleeting prospects and took on risky endeavors, others focused on carefully planned methods, combining modest investments with routines that encouraged steady returns. Just as those miners pooled resources to optimize their chances, today's traders find value in on-chain analytics and strategic fund management to stand apart in evolving markets.