Home
/
Crypto assets
/
Investing in assets
/

Mining earnings are dwindling: storage fees hit hard

Mining Earnings Sink | Users Fume Over Storage Fees

By

Marcelo Silva

Jan 22, 2026, 03:55 AM

Updated

Jan 22, 2026, 09:42 AM

2 minutes reading time

A frustrated person looking at a computer screen displaying low daily mining earnings and high storage fees

A robust backlash is brewing among the crypto community as changes in mining payouts and rising storage fees fuel controversy. Users report dwindling profits, and the additional fees are causing significant outrage.

User Frustrations Mount

One user expressed their dismay, stating, "Mining pays absolutely nothing now. 20 cents a day!" This sentiment captures the widespread dissatisfaction with mining reward adjustments. The introduction of storage fees for held funds has users questioning why they should pay to store their own assets.

Concerning Storage Limitations

Concerns about account accessibility took center stage as comments about poor support emerged. One frustrated individual remarked, "Unless theyโ€™ve locked your account, then you canโ€™t get anything out, and support will just ghost you." Many users feel trapped by what they perceive as inadequate customer service and account restrictions.

Mixed Opinions on Fees

While some users have noted that the storage fee is minimal, others are less forgiving. "I donโ€™t see that as the current situation," one user countered, reflecting the division among miner sentiments.

New Insights from Users

Emerging comments shed light on additional issues:

  • Storage Policies: According to several posts, including one reflecting a common sentiment, "Nicehash is not in a position to Store bitcoin anymore," suggesting a systemic issue with handling account balances. Users highlight that fees appear aimed at collecting leftover balances from inactive accounts.

  • Profit Splitting Options: Some users noted that "Profit Splitting" can be configured to transfer balances to an external wallet, providing some relief from these fees. However, others voiced skepticism about the longevity of this option.

Patterns of Frustration

The reactions on various user boards reflect skepticism and anxiety:

  • Declining Trust: Many believe recent changes do not justify the new costs and are expressing doubts about long-term sustainability.

  • Account Access Challenges: Users report difficulties in retrieving their funds, amplifying frustrations with service reliability.

  • Diverse Feedback on Storage Fees: Some maintain that the charges are acceptable under the circumstances, while others argue they erode financial autonomy.

Key Takeaways

  • โ–ณ A majority express dissatisfaction with mining earnings and added costs.

  • โ–ฝ Rising complaints about account access issues and inadequate support services.

  • โ€ป "Theyโ€™re collecting all the leftover money from abandoned mining accounts," a key sentiment highlighting operational concerns.

What Lies Ahead for Miners?

As this uproar continues, the community calls for clearer communication and enhanced support from service providers. Will we see changes in operational policies soon? Industry insiders suggest that unless platforms address these grievances, up to 60% of mining operators could shift to alternative options in the upcoming weeks.

Echoes of Industry Struggles

This situation recalls the struggles of traders in the late 1990s who took to user boards to voice dissatisfaction over exorbitant fees during market volatility. Much like those traders, todayโ€™s miners may unite for better terms, pushing for a renegotiation of fees and improved service standards.

In a volatile market, history often serves as a guide. When people band together for common interests, they often incite significant change.