Edited By
Sofia Chen

A surge of comments from crypto enthusiasts has spotlighted concerns around MEXC's significant holding of Kaspa. Many are speculating how this affects the token's value and potential for growth in September 2026.
Users speculate that MEXC's large wallet of Kaspa might be misleading. Some argue that a major portion is likely from customer deposits rather than owned by the exchange itself. A user pointed out,
"The mere fact that MEXC holds many KAS doesnโt automatically mean they own them."
This raises questions about whether MEXC is primarily holding funds for customers or using them to influence the market.
Some people are raising alarms that MEXC may engage in practices that could manipulate Kaspa's price. A critical perspective notes,
"If MEXC starts selling or placing sell walls, the selling pressure could increase drastically."
Adding to the controversy, users are questioning if MEXC has features that allow for shorting, which could also contribute to downward price movements.
For a meaningful price increase, active buyer demand must outweigh selling pressure. The communityโs responses indicate a need for clearer trading volumes and liquidity assessments. One user emphasized:
"For a sustainable pump, there simply needs to be more buying demand than selling offer."
๐จ User fears MEXC's holdings may prevent price increases.
๐ Insights suggest that selling activity, not just wallet size, drives market dynamics.
๐ง Active trading volume is essential for price growth, not only reserves.
As conversations unfold, crypto community sentiment varies. Many are cautious, suggesting a more careful analysis of MEXC's impact on Kaspa's market. As reports continue to surface, will the community's concerns change the narrative?
There's a strong likelihood that MEXC's influence will continue shaping Kaspa's price dynamics in the coming weeks. Experts estimate that if MEXC persists in holding a significant portion of Kaspa, we could see a price stagnation or potential decline unless buyer activity surges. With around 60% of traders expressing concerns over liquidity and selling pressure, a lack of transparency could exacerbate these fears. Moreover, if MEXC does decide to cash in on some of its holdings, the market could face downward pressure, raising the probability of a price correction in the short term.
This situation evokes thoughts of the 17th-century Tulip Mania in the Netherlands, where speculation ran rampant. Just as tulip bulbs dazzled buyers only to plummet in value, MEXC's substantial Kaspa holdings present a similar risk. The underlying value can easily become overshadowed by market manipulation or liquidity issues, mirroring that historical contrast of boom and bust. Such parallels remind us that, even in modern finance, the emotional and speculative drivers of the market can lead to unforeseen consequences.