
A growing number of comments are fueling a debate on trading automation, with many traders expressing confusion about why they don鈥檛 automate their successful trades. As of September 2026, emotional control continues to be cited as a significant barrier.
In recent forums, traders highlighted the difference between trading as a job and investing for wealth building. One comment noted, "5%-20% per month is a different ballgame than 12% per year," emphasizing that income from trading and investing benefits individuals differently. This distinction may inform why traders hesitate to adopt automation鈥攖hey often view trading as a profession rather than a means of passive income.
Another user commented, "Most people follow the crowd, but I like to follow smart money," suggesting that individual approaches to trading can conflict with the idea of automation. This reiterates a sentiment that many traders possess effective systems yet remain reluctant to automate due to emotional attachments to their decisions.
Several users discussed the technical difficulties involved in automating trading strategies. One trader stated, "Coding concepts like FVG or OB are extremely difficult to mimic your strategy 1-1," highlighting the complexities of translating successful manual processes into automated ones. This perspective may impact traders' willingness to shift to automation and reflects the technical knowledge required to create functional trading bots.
馃挼 Many view trading as job rather than passive income opportunity.
馃攧 Distinction between trading gains and investing profits complicates automation.
馃 Coding and technical know-how are critical hurdles for strategy automation.
Despite ongoing discussions in the trading community, the choice to automate hinges on whether traders can reconcile emotional factors with the objective nature of automated systems. As technology develops, will more traders opt for automation over their traditional methods? Only the next few years will tell.