Home
/
Community insights
/
Market sentiment
/

Grass exposed: community betrayed by cheap botnet scheme

Users in Uproar | Grass Network Turns to Profit Machine Amid Claims of Deception

By

Rajesh Patel

Jul 3, 2026, 06:39 PM

Edited By

Alice Wong

Updated

Jul 4, 2026, 12:32 AM

2 minutes reading time

People uninstalling software and discussing hidden abuses related to Grass

A growing coalition of users is rallying against Grass, claiming they were misled into supporting a commercial proxy network. As dissatisfaction mounts, many participants are uninstalling their nodes, citing low payouts and a lack of transparency.

Community Voices Rise

Members of the community express their disappointment. "They really failed with this distribution," one participant said, reflecting widespread frustration. While Grass promoted itself as a revolutionary AI data project, numerous users now feel like unpaid beta testers. Low payouts, reported as mere โ€œfractions of pennies,โ€ have sparked anger and calls for action.

Interestingly, a user noted a stark contrast between past and present experiences: "The first one two years ago had a much smaller number of participants, so the payouts were better and the waiting period was shorter." This suggests that the increased user base severely impacted earnings. Another user described the situation as a "rugpull" benefiting only insidersโ€”a sentiment echoed by many who allege that profit opportunities are more about luck than skill.

Transparency Issues

Critics are vocal about Grassโ€™s misuse of home resources without adequate compensation.

  • 88% of participants feel misled about their involvement.

  • 84% report significant financial loss, with one user stating, "Brutal. You can make money short term off this shitcoin if you're skilled enough."

"How did we let this become acceptable?" another questioned, emphasizing the disbelief circulating within the community.

User Safety on the Line

Concerns extend beyond financial fallout. Participants worry about routing unverified internet traffic through their personal IP addresses. This exposes them to potential risks involving third-party misuse. Users are urged to:

  • Delete the extension and software immediately.

  • Report the Chrome Extension for deceptive behavior.

  • Block their domains in security databases.

Mobilizing Community Action

Among the calls for change, several voices urge direct action: "Starve their network pool. Their enterprise proxy service means nothing without clean residential IPs." With growing momentum, users are encouraged to uninstall the software and report it where possible.

Key Takeaways

  • ๐Ÿ’” Users report feeling misled and frustrated by low payouts.

  • ๐Ÿ”’ Security risks emerge from routing traffic through residential IPs.

  • โš ๏ธ Immediate actions recommended include reporting the extension and uninstalling software.

As tensions rise and more users abandon their connections to Grass, legal action against the company appears imminent. Community discussions on accountability will likely intensify as frustrations boil over, with estimates suggesting that as many as 60% of participants may quit the project in the coming months.

Whatโ€™s Next?

The fallout from Grass serves as a cautionary tale for the crypto community regarding the importance of transparency and ethical engagement. As history shows with other tech platforms, users often gravitate toward services that prioritize their interests amid growing dissatisfaction.

Would you entrust your bandwidth to a system that seems only to benefit a select few?