
A growing number of people are raising concerns about recent changes to Kraken's Funded program, which have restricted drawdowns. Many view these adjustments as detrimental, making the experience feel more like gambling than trading.
Originally, participants in Kraken's Funded program could invest $20, $50, or $90 to access accounts worth $1,000, $5,000, or $10,000. They needed to achieve a 12% profit with paper money before unlocking real funds. However, the maximum drawdown was recently reduced from 5% to 3%, which many feel significantly compromises the program's integrity.
Forum discussions reveal a chorus of dissatisfaction:
One commenter said, "3% is incredibly restrictive no matter how conservative the trading strategy."
Another user expressed, "This is ridiculous; they're practically gambling with this setup."
A question surfaced regarding existing accounts: "Does this impact only new funded accounts or accounts that were already open too?"
People have highlighted several pressing issues:
Drawdown Limit: The reduction to a 3% drawdown has sparked worries. The 5% threshold previously allowed for buffer, while the new limit exposes accounts to higher risk.
Confusion Over Applicability: Many are uncertain if the changes apply to all accounts or just new ones, adding to their frustration.
Inherent Volatility: The volatile nature of crypto trading makes participants feel the 3% restriction is particularly challenging, as noted by a user who stated, "One tiny move down and youโre cooked."
Overall, responses lean heavily negative. Participants feel that these new limits severely limit their ability to trade effectively.
๐ฝ A large portion of comments criticize the new drawdown limit, with many feeling it turns trading into gambling.
๐ The lack of clarity concerning existing accounts raises further concerns about transparency from Kraken.
๐ค The pressing nature of these issues calls for Kraken to reevaluate their policy to maintain engagement.
Could the pushback lead Kraken to revise these new guidelines? The platform may need to reconsider its strategy to improve user confidence and retention amidst this backlash.