Home
/
Market analysis
/
Investment strategies
/

Why buybacks in crypto projects might be a mistake

Buybacks in Crypto: Growing Skepticism among People | A Call for Change

By

Oliver Smith

Jan 26, 2026, 03:52 AM

Updated

Jan 26, 2026, 09:13 AM

Brief read

A group of people discussing crypto buybacks with charts and coins on a table.

A rising tide of people is questioning the effectiveness of buybacks in the crypto sector. Recent discussions on user boards have ignited a debate over whether these strategies are a good use of funds, particularly amid expectations of upcoming announcements that could impact market sentiment.

What Are Buybacks, and Why Are They Controversial?

Crypto projects frequently resort to buybacksโ€”repurchasing tokens to enhance value. Yet, as the community weighs in, many are expressing doubts about this approach. Some believe that the focus is shifting toward more sustainable strategies, urging a critical rethinking of resource management.

The Case Against Buybacks

Forums are buzzing with critical perspectives on buybacks. One commentator notes, "The money for buybacks comes from somewhere; this could be used smarter."

Concerns center around:

  • Diversion of Funds: Critics argue that every dollar spent on buybacks should instead be allocated for development or community initiatives.

  • Demand Generation: Some users suggest restoring benefits tied to particular tokens could create a better demand for them.

  • Connection to Utility: Comments highlight that separating utility tokens from exchanges could harm both the token and the platform, as seen in the case with CRO.

Community Sentiment: A Mixed Bag

The debate showcases a blend of optimism and caution among people:

"Letโ€™s print another 100 billion tokens!"

This remark reflects a playful jab at how some projects seem stuck in cyclical patterns of inflation instead of addressing buyback concerns.

Emerging Alternatives

The discussion is igniting new ideas for sustaining token value. Communities suggest that buybacks should pivot toward using profits for buying back and burning tokens, akin to successful implementations seen with major projects.

Key Takeaways

  • โ—‡ A growing number of comments challenge the effectiveness of buybacks.

  • โ—‡ Community members argue for reinvesting profits instead of token buybacks.

  • โ—‡ Demand for tokens could be better generated through restored perks.

As conversations unfold, the crypto world faces potential shifts in strategy, emphasizing community-driven initiatives rather than traditional buybacks. What impact will this have on project valuations and user engagement in the coming months?