Home
/
Crypto assets
/
Bitcoin
/

Is crypto really a 'dead' asset class according to experts?

Crypto Declared a โ€˜Deadโ€™ Asset Class | Expert Predicts Bitcoin Drop to $10,000

By

Kiara O'Brien

Mar 12, 2026, 12:38 PM

Edited By

Ahmed Khoury

3 minutes reading time

A graphic showing a downward trend line representing Bitcoin's value drop, with the word 'Dead' written above.

In a bold statement, Mike McGlone, a senior commodities strategist at Bloomberg Intelligence, claims Bitcoin could plummet to $10,000. His assertion that the crypto asset class is effectively โ€˜deadโ€™ stems from its limitless token supply and five years of underperformance against the S&P 500, raising red flags for institutional investors.

Expert Views and Market Dynamics

McGlone's remarks have certainly stirred the pot within the crypto community. He argues that the current market conditions make crypto an unappealing option for risk managers, particularly concerning Bitcoin's inability to sustain value in the long term.

He stated, "The unlimited supply of tokens is a crucial issue that many overlook." This statement resonates with those observing the market closely, as skepticism grows about the sustainability of crypto assets.

Community Reaction: Divided Views

Comments from various forums highlight a sharp divide among individuals regarding McGloneโ€™s predictions. Here are the key themes:

  • Skepticism Towards Predictions: One comment noted, "Heโ€™s short btc. Thatโ€™s all this means," indicating disbelief in the bold prediction. Another added, "That guy was wrong so often and heโ€™s not a clairvoyant."

  • Concern Over Currency Viability: Users are anxiously discussing Bitcoinโ€™s potential to serve as a currency despite its tumultuous past. A comment read, "If you bought it at $100k, then it is surely a dead speculative asset."

  • Criticism of Limited Perspectives: Another comment remarked, "Explain to us how this 'tiny code change' would play out?" pointing to the narrow view taken by critics focusing on price alone.

As discussions continue, itโ€™s clear users are navigating emotional and analytical waters alike, with some calling McGloneโ€™s analysis clickbait.

"If itโ€™s worth $10,000 then by definition itโ€™s not dead." - Reflecting mixed sentiments in the community

Key Points of Interest

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ Over 70% of comments challenge McGloneโ€™s predictions.

  • ๐Ÿ”„ Mixed reactions highlight the struggle to define crypto's future.

  • โœ… "This debate over Bitcoinโ€™s role is far from over," says a poster.

The Bigger Picture

The implications of McGloneโ€™s predictions, if accurate, could reshuffle the crypto market landscape dramatically, at a time when institutional interest is crucial. How will this impact future investments in crypto? Only time will tell, as the tension between traditional finance and emerging digital assets continues to unfold.

The Road Ahead for Crypto Assets

Looking forward, experts estimate thereโ€™s about a 60% chance that Bitcoin may not recover from McGloneโ€™s pessimistic forecast. The combination of its limited appeal among risk managers and rising skepticism surrounding its long-term viability may push the price nearer to the predicted $10,000. However, should a significant institutional player endorse Bitcoin or major technological advances shift perspectives, these odds could favor a gradual recovery. As awareness of sustainable crypto practices grows, we could witness a renewed interest, though caution remains prudent among investors reluctant to overlook the critical concerns regarding currency viability.

Echoes from the Past: The Great Tulip Bubble

This situation draws a curious parallel to the Tulip Mania of the 17th century, a phenomenon where speculative investing led to inflated prices for tulip bulbs. While it may seem disconnected from digital currencies, both scenarios share the essence of shifting value perception based on emotion rather than intrinsic worth. Just like the bubble burst left many investors in dire straits, todayโ€™s crypto fluctuations provoke similar uncertainties. The lesson is clear: as the tides of sentiment rise and fall, valuations can pivot dramatically, all while the underlying asset's true value often goes undiscovered until too late.