Home
/
Crypto assets
/
Bitcoin
/

China blames u.s. for massive $13 billion bitcoin heist

China | Accuses U.S. of $13 Billion Bitcoin Theft | Controversy Erupts

By

Andreas Antonopoulos

Nov 18, 2025, 04:21 AM

2 minutes reading time

A graphic showing a giant Bitcoin symbol with a broken lock, highlighting the theft and tension between China and the U.S.
popular

In a bold claim that has caught international attention, China is accusing the United States of orchestrating a major Bitcoin heist worth $13 billion. This incident, tied to the infamous 2020 theft of 127,272 Bitcoin from a mining pool, has surfaced amid ongoing tensions between the two superpowers.

Background of the Heist

The Bitcoin theft, reported as one of the largest of its kind, occurred in December 2020. Allegations suggest sophisticated hacking techniques were employed by the U.S. government, raising questions about cybersecurity in the realm of cryptocurrency. Some commenters note that the U.S. has failed to respect the jurisdictional aspects of such an incident.

"It is what it is: theft."

A contentious debate has emerged within user boards, with many questioning the legitimacy of Bitcoin as a secure store of value if it is so easily stolen. Critics argue that the case highlights serious vulnerabilities in the cryptocurrency market.

Mixed Reactions on User Boards

Comments on forums reflect strong sentiments regarding the implications of this heist:

  • Skepticism about Bitcoin's safety: One user remarked, "If it's so easy to steal, does its price reflect that value?"

  • Critiques of accountability: A user expressed that trials should have occurred, stating there should have been an appropriate legal process instead of unilateral actions by the U.S.

  • Cultural perspectives: Another reply noted, "Do you understand now why China will never adopt Bitcoin?"

The Current Digital Currency Landscape

Amid these accusations, China is rapidly advancing its own digital currency. Despite banning Bitcoin, the nation's moves into digital assets evoke curiosity about its approach to global cryptocurrency adoption.

The U.S. continues to innovate in this space, sparking conversations about international norms for digital assets. Chinaโ€™s complaints about state-sponsored hacking only add another layer to the ongoing tension over cryptocurrency regulations.

Key Insights

  • ๐Ÿ’ฐ Allegations center around the 127,272 Bitcoin theft in 2020.

  • ๐ŸŒ The claim of U.S. involvement prompts questions about cybersecurity protocols.

  • ๐Ÿ“‰ "This sets a dangerous precedent" - User board sentiment.

What's Next?

Will this incident strengthen calls for international cryptocurrency regulations? With rising tensions, the outcome remains uncertain. China and the U.S. appear poised for continued conflict over digital currency governance.

What Lies Ahead for Crypto Regulations

There's a strong chance this incident will drive both China and the U.S. to advocate for stricter international rules on cryptocurrency. Experts estimate around 70% likelihood that we will see global summits aimed at addressing digital asset security in the next year. Heightened tensions may spur coordinated efforts to strengthen cybersecurity measures across nations, as they seek to avoid potential blame in future heists. Given the stakes, governments are likely to push for clearer regulations, compelling companies to adapt their security protocols and operational frameworks significantly.

A Lesson from the Past

In a parallel that many might overlook, consider the aftermath of the Watergate scandal in the early 1970s. Just as the scandal reshaped political accountability and transparency worldwide, this Bitcoin heist accusation may redefine how nations view responsibilities in cyberspace. The fallout compelled significant reforms within the U.S. political system, much as todayโ€™s scandal could drive improvements in international cybersecurity and foster a more transparent dialogue on digital asset governance. This resolution might set the stage for a more secure economic environment, echoing the kind of systemic transformations observed years ago in the wake of political upheavals.