Edited By
Lara Johnson

A key trading pair is set to vanish from BitMart's platform, as it announces the delisting of PORT3 and the suspension of related trading features by January 25, 2026. Users face a deadline to withdraw assets or risk losses, raising eyebrows across forums.
BitMart confirmed it will remove PORT3 from its listing, leading to the suspension of the trading pair PORT3_USDT. Sources reveal that if orders aren't canceled, the system will do that automatically by the cutoff date, refunding users directly to their trading accounts.
Users must action withdrawals by 14:00 PM UTC on January 25, 2026. Post-deadline, unexchanged assets might result in losses, and BitMart has stated they will assume no responsibility for such an outcome. As one user commented, "Not withdrawing related tokens timely may result in assets loss."
Users have expressed mixed feelings:
Concern over the sudden move
Appreciation for the advance notice
Calls to withdraw assets promptly
One user summarized, "Delistings are never ideal, but itโs good that BitMart gives advance notice and a clear deadline." Meanwhile, others lamented the strict standards of the exchange, with one saying, "BitMart is very strict."
The sentiment around this change is palpable. Comments on forums reflect a range of reactions:
"Everyone, donโt wait until the last minute! ๐"
"Itโs unfortunate, but BitMartโs strict standards never compromise."
๐ซ PORT3 delisting confirmed by January 25, 2026
โณ Withdrawal deadline set for 14:00 PM UTC
๐ Possible asset loss for late withdrawals
๐ฅ Community divided: strict exchange rules vs. appreciation for early notice
As time runs out for users, many contemplate their next steps in this sudden shift. With an emphasis on quick action from BitMartโs users, this decision has certainly ignited discussions within the cryptocurrency community.
There's a solid chance that this delisting could indicate a tightening of regulations within the crypto space. As BitMart reassesses its listing criteria, more exchanges might follow suit, leading to an increased focus on compliance and asset viability. Experts estimate that up to 30% of lesser-known or underperforming tokens could face similar fates over the next year as exchanges seek to provide a more stable trading environment. Those who move swiftly to withdraw their tokens stand a better chance of safeguarding their investments, whereas the indecisive may find themselves faced with unfavorable losses.
Reflecting on the events surrounding BitMart's PORT3 delisting, one might think of the early days of VHS vs. Betamax. In the late 1970s, the Betamax format boasted superior quality, yet its strict licensing led to its downfall against VHS, which, despite being technically inferior, catered to the masses and thrived. Similarly, BitMartโs stringent approach juxtaposed with its competitors' looser standards could reshape the trading landscape, leaving behind those tokens deemed unworthy of continued support. In both cases, rigid standards and quality measures played a significant role in determining the ultimate winners and losers in a competitive market.