Edited By
Amir Khorram

Bitcoin discussions often zero in on price points, but recent conversations reveal a deeper inquiry. Some people are now questioning its actual functionality as a currency versus an investment option.
In an evolving conversation, some users argue that Bitcoin is more than just a volatile asset; it's a future-oriented financial solution. Yet, others criticize its function as mere collateral for loans. "Isnโt it supposed to be money?" a user remarked, addressing the core belief that Bitcoin should facilitate transactions without needing conversion to fiat.
The backdrop centers around a critical revelation: the reliance on Bitcoin as a stable financial asset is contested. The ongoing debate highlights fears that blockchain companies may collapse, amplifying skepticism about crypto as a whole.
Use as Collateral: Many discussions touch on using Bitcoin as collateral in decentralized finance (DeFi). One comment notes, "You can take BTC and borrow against it" Despite the risks, this method has gained traction among some who see it as innovative financing.
Questions on Stability: Concerns rise regarding whether Bitcoin can maintain stability during transactions. "It works just as well as long as it is stable," a participant asserted, emphasizing that without stability, Bitcoin can't function effectively as a currency.
Cross-Border Transactions: Several users point to Bitcoinโs original purpose for international payments, which requires a stable pricing model. One comment mentions hiring workers overseas quickly through Bitcoin transactions, but the anticipated volatility presents major hurdles.
"In the remittance situation, crypto isnโt 'money' until itโs converted into fiat."
Overall, the sentiment seems mixed. While some appear optimistic about Bitcoin's role in modern finance, many appear skeptical or critical of its real-world effectiveness. This division paints a picture of a community grappling with its beliefs and futures.
๐ "Isn't it supposed to BE money?" - Questioning Bitcoin's role
๐ Risk management essential if using BTC as collateral
๐ Majority agree: Stability is crucial for functionality
In these discussions, people are starting to ask more pointed questions about Bitcoin's viability beyond price speculation, marking a shift in how Bitcoin is perceived and utilized. As people navigate these conversations, one must wonder: Will Bitcoin ever achieve its intended purpose as a currency?
As the debate around Bitcoin intensifies, there's a strong chance that its use as collateral in decentralized finance will continue to grow, driven by innovations in technology and evolving market needs. Experts estimate that within the next few years, about 30% of the current Bitcoin holders could explore collateral options as frictionless borrowing solutions gain traction. Meanwhile, if Bitcoin's price stabilizes, the sentiment might shift positively; around 65% of people believe that transaction efficiency could improve, making it more viable for cross-border payments. However, if volatility persists, distrust may lead to fewer being willing to adopt Bitcoin as a daily currency, with predictions that transactions may stall, leaving Bitcoin primarily as an investment asset rather than as a functional currency.
In reflecting on the challenges Bitcoin faces, one might draw a less obvious comparison to the waning days of the gold standard in the early 20th century. Just as individuals and nations grappled with the inflexibility of gold backing during economic shifts, today's discourse around Bitcoin mirrors that very struggle. People then questioned if valuable resources should dictate currency rather than trust in the system itself. This shift towards a more flexible, trust-based monetary system paved the way for the wealth of transactions we see today. Similarly, Bitcoin may eventually need to pivot its narrative and functionality to truly fulfill its promise as a medium of exchange, rather than just an investment vehicle.